| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:09 am Post subject: Danny & Duncan in the rain |
|
|
Here are a couple more shots (the better one being in POTM) from a 10-15 minute demo that Danny Macaskill and Duncan Shaw did at Innerleithen last Saturday. The heavens opened just a few minutes before they started and I was caught out without any protection for myself or the camera.
I managed a few shots in horrendous conditions using D200, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 & SB600 before the LCD stopped working. Camera has since dried out and seems to be working fine though. So much for British summer, eh?
C&C appreciated, as always (escpecially with regards to contrast/exposure as I'm using a new laptop and am not too confident about the brightness/contrast setting at the moment):
Duncan sidehopping
Danny backflipping

_________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You've done well considering the conditions! Perhaps a shallower depth of field might have looked good in the first shot as the rider is a tad lost in the crowd, not badly though.
Is it just me or is that a tiny ramp he's flipping from in the second shot?! _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The kicker is about 1-2ft.
Mental. _________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BenAtBedgebury Very High User

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 223
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great shot timing. know what JAW means about the first.
That must have required fast rotation! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sadly it's not really possible to get less DOF in the first shot as it's a wide/normal angle. It's actually f2.8 which is as wide as that lens goes.
I don't have a lens that takes shots at 24mm with a wider aperture. And I can't afford a Nikon 24mm f1.4 at the moment, even if I could track one down.
_________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|