| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BenAtBedgebury Very High User

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 223
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:30 am Post subject: 8mp phones |
|
|
Saw a few companies advertising 8 megapixel camera phones. Does this seem a little silly?
Is it a case of bigger means better or are they actually propperly built?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I reckon it's just for the bragging rights. Mind you, it'd be pretty good if you intend to use it as your main camera, but other wise there's no point.
It's got 2 megapixels more than my DSLR....  _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's all bollox and just marketing nonsense to make people believe they're buying a much better camera. We all know that good photos is about way more than MPcount and >6MP is only needed if you're printing huge shots/cropping a lot.
Also, the phones will most likely continue to compress the hell out of any photos taken on the supposedly 8MP sensor. I've a supposedly 5MP camera phone, except the best quality setting gives <900kB jpegs. _________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
simpson Average User

Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i would rather just get my small crappy phone and attached it to the under side of my dslr lol that would not fit in my pocket |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BenAtBedgebury Very High User

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 223
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems to be similar thoughts then
There seems to be a race about makings bigger and 'better' as opposed to making existing technology more reliable. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikedeere Forum Regular

Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 266
Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cramming that many pixels onto such a small sensor is just foolish.
The closer they are together, the more they interfere with each other. That's when you get more noise and softer edges.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|