| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds good! Thanks for keeping us informed Hamish. _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikedeere Forum Regular

Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 266
Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's what I've been waiting for, full frame sensor with a suitably wide/sharp lens to match.
14-24mm f/2.8... How crazy is that? Effectively wider than all the 10-20mm lenses we see at the moment, and it's faster. I was expecting the ol' 14mm f/2.8 to make a comeback but no, they've outdone themselves.
But yeah like you say, need to save the pennies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like my sigma 10-20 but the 14-24 2.8 is going to be seriously tempting, even for use on a DX sensor. If it's anything like as good as Nikon's other f2.8 zooms then it'll be a cracker (not to mention about £1K a pop).
I really don't want to be seduced into buying a new body when my d200 works okay, but the D300 is going to be mighy tempting if the AF is as good as everyone hopes and the High ISO performance is up to scratch. I can't justify the D3 unless I win the lottery. Then again I never buy tickets so that's quite unlikely. _________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sassycat11736 High User


Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 169
Location: Portsmouth
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm calling my hamster Hamish.
_________________ one mother****er at a time, please! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|