| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:47 pm Post subject: One of my first... |
|
|
Here is one of my first 35mm slr shots that I processed entirely myself at school. It was taken in low light and I used a grade 4 filter to enhance the tones. N.B: Please excuse the quality: it has been scanned and then resized so it's bound to be rubbish!
Let me know what you think!
_________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grinch8 Forum Regular

Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 277
Location: Surrey
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Love it, the scratches add sometime to it _________________ www.TOMGRUNDY.BLOGSPOT.COM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cheers, thanks for the response!! _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rad2themax Quite High User

Joined: 14 Dec 2006 Posts: 136
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the scratches are too much to be honest. If you have't been taught this already then gently rubbing your nose against the shiny side of a neg can go some way to removing scratches (because your skin contains the same chemical used on the neg or something similair.
An i woulda gone with a Grade 3 as i think the shadows are a bit too dark but that's just me  _________________ www.watfordriders.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rad2themax wrote: | | I think the scratches are too much to be honest. If you have't been taught this already then gently rubbing your nose against the shiny side of a neg can go some way to removing scratches (because your skin contains the same chemical used on the neg or something similair. |
I didn't put the scratches there by choice! If I had any say in the matter they wouldn't be there. As for rubbing your nose... wouldn't that put grease all over the negative?? No, seriously, i'd have to give it a try.
| rad2themax wrote: | An i woulda gone with a Grade 3 as i think the shadows are a bit too dark but that's just me  |
I think the 4 makes it look more moody. Also remember it's not totally accurate as it's been scanned in.
Thanks for the feedback though! _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikedeere Forum Regular

Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 266
Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
All I can say is "TONE!"
Wouldn't be able to do that with digital. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True enough!! _________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluebomberx Quite High User

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Posts: 134
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
JAW, next time you know you want to post one of your b/w prints, make one specifically for the purpose of scanning with lower contrast. Your scanner will handle it better. Also if you use the same enlarger again, see if you can get rid of the hair and dust in the enlarger. it's either in the lens, or in the negative carrier.
I've been thinking about shooting b/w again and getting the developing tanks and reels. My wife is already on my ass for shooting film after buying a 5D  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish Forum Veteran

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hairs and scratches rock. They look so much better than the digital versions some folk use to give the pic an old feel.
Nice work, JAW. I like the heavy contrast. I'll leave the technical advice about scanning and all that to everyone else. Virtually all my B&W work has been through digital. _________________ Hamish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAW Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 1322
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cheers for the feedback guys, thanks for the tip about the scanner too.
went to london recently on a photography trip (mainly V&A, southbank & tate modern) and shot a roll. Couldn't be bothered to develop it all at school so I sent it off to get developed. Didn't know it would cost me £9.50! 
_________________
Click on my sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|